Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3930T - 173 vs 170 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
