Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1629 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 122 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £119.95 vs £315.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.98 vs £3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 58 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |