Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 551 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 35 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 58 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £106.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
38.618745595489784%
Multi-Core
948
23.629112662013956%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |