Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 2682 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 158 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £382.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
20.588235294117645%
Multi-Core
992
5.675381886835631%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |