Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1771 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £25.15 vs £499.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £0.23 vs £3.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3900 - 135 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£25.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £25.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |