Buy on Amazon
£128.82
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - 99 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - £51.44 vs £128.82
- Up to 63% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - £0.52 vs £1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
92
92.92929292929293%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
37.142857142857146%
Price, £
£128.82
39%
Intel Celeron G3900 Dual-Core Processor (2 Core, 2.80 GHz)
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2991 minutes ago
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£51.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G Processor with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (2C/4T, 3.5 GHz Base Clock)
Buy for £51.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
60.71055381400209%
Multi-Core
992
50.22784810126583%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
