Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2353 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-9590 - 333 vs 321 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
