Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1840 is 324 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 71% cheaper than FX-9370 - £49.95 vs £169.97
- Up to 71% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-9370 - £0.21 vs £0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
236
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |