Buy on Amazon
£5.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9590 is 173 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 96% cheaper than FX-9590 - £5.99 vs £141.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-9590 - £0.01 vs £0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1820 - 609 vs 605 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
605
99.3431855500821%
Value, £/FPS
£0.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1820 2.70 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processor LGA 1150
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4189 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
609
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
4.3478260869565215%
Price, £
£141
4%
FPS Winner
AMD FX-9590 Vishera 8-Core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W FD9590FHHKWOF Desktop Processor - Black
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
90.25735294117648%
Multi-Core
825
38.00092123445417%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
