Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
