Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - £5.56 vs £189.81
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75686 minutes ago
Buy for £189.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75688 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
32.22390317700454%
Multi-Core
739
15.753570667235131%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |