Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2040 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron B830 - 124 vs 120 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
