Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3852 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 122% better in F1 23 than Celeron 847 - 277 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
277
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |