Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3725 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 244% better in League of Legends than Core i7-2700K - 272 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - £113.0 vs £139.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-2700K - £0.42 vs £1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for £139.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |