Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4217 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 138% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron 847 - 133 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£111.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £111.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |