Buy on Amazon
£428.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1618 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 1000M - 187 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£428.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80673I97900X Core Processor i9-7900X 3.3 GHz
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
