Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3210 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron 1000M - 284 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 24 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£260.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |