Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 802 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 240 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Colfax | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
