Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1950 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4800MQ - 347 vs 336 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 47 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
