Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1022 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 338 vs 330 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
338
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
