Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1730 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Borderlands 3 than Pentium Gold G6405 - 211 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 5% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - £47.57 vs £49.95
- Up to 4% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - £0.23 vs £0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
211
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
95%
Price, £
£49.95
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17827 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£47.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £47.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |