Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 363 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 166 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £158.88 vs £599.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.96 vs £3.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |