Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 1923 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 60% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 241 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £197.82 vs £351.64
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
151
62.655601659751035%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£351.64
56%
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for £197.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
51.89409368635438%
Multi-Core
7454
60.47379522959597%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |