Buy on Amazon
£99.74
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1314 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 30% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 215 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£99.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £99.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Core i5-11400F
War Thunder, 1920 x 1080, Movie
155 FPS
£5.81/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
