Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10300 - 282 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £111.01 vs £126.8
- Up to 9% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11400F - £0.41 vs £0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
91%
Price, £
£126.8
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for £126.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
271
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£111.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £111.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |