Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £315.0 vs £518.97
- Up to 22% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.47 vs £0.6 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 28% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 862 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
672
77%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
862
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
78%
Price, £
£518.97
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £518.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |