Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 606 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 166 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |