Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 43% better in Valorant than FX-4350 - 978 vs 685 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £59.97 vs £1049.89
- Up to 92% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.09 vs £1.07 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
978
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
8%
Price, £
£1049.89
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,049.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |