Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3823 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 44% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4350 - 166 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £59.97 vs £484.37
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £484.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76687 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |