Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 34% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4350 - 121 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £59.97 vs £2445.47
- Up to 97% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400 - £0.67 vs £20.21 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £2,445.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |