Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 585 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 259 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
259
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |