Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 7 4800H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 115 days newer than Ryzen 7 4800H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 7 4800H - 221 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 4800H - 20 vs 16 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
221
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£222.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £222.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |