Buy on Amazon
£225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £225.0 vs £325.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 2700 - 274 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD YD2700BBAFBOX Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire RGB LED Cooler
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74646 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74646 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
66.46778042959427%
Multi-Core
5489
65.14360313315926%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
