Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 115 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 262 vs 252 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
