Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600HS is 1946 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 129 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Renoir | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |