Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1405 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 106% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3900 - 220 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
107
48.63636363636364%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.0962441314554%
Multi-Core
992
13.735807255607865%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |