Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 180 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400F - 193 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
80.86854460093896%
Multi-Core
4834
66.9343672112988%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |