Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 298 days older than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400F - 193 vs 188 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
84.38967136150235%
Multi-Core
5751
79.63168097479922%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |