Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 618 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105F - 193 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
85.32863849765259%
Multi-Core
4472
61.92190528939352%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |