Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 5 2500X vs Celeron G6900

Ryzen 5 2500X vs Celeron G6900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1212 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900

  • Performs up to 3% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 5 2500X - 219 vs 212 FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Mass Effect: Andromeda.
Mass Effect: Andromeda

Mass Effect: Andromeda

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo
Ryzen 5 2500X

Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018


FPS

212

96.80365296803653%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


FPS

219

100%

Value, £/FPS

£0.27/FPS

100%

Price, £

£58.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Celeron® G6900 Desktop Processor 4M Cache, up to 3.4 GHz

Buy for £58.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 32584 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo
Ryzen 5 2500X

Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo
Ryzen 5 2500X

Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018


Single-Core

1103

68.80848409232688%

Multi-Core

3801

100%

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


Single-Core

1603

100%

Multi-Core

2696

70.92870297290187%

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

vs
Intel Celeron G6900 Logo

Intel Celeron G6900

Sep 10th, 2018Release Date
Jan 4th, 2022
Ryzen 5CollectionCeleron
Pinnacle RidgeCodenameAlder Lake
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
8
Threads2
3.6 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.4 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
65 WTDPNot Available
12 nmProcess Size
10 nm
36.0x
Multiplier34.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 710
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

© 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.