Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 160 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G4900 - 246 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
229
93.08943089430895%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32547 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
55.84768812330009%
Multi-Core
1051
27.650618258353067%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |