Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 652 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G4900 - 156 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
156
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
