Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 265 days older than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 348 vs 338 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
348
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Single-Core
1102
79.9709724238026%
Multi-Core
3078
63.67397600330988%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |