Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 533 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 122 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Single-Core
1102
75.79092159559835%
Multi-Core
3078
68.82826475849731%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |