Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7100 - 112 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £64.99 vs £225.0
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76891 minutes ago
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76891 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
74.67065868263472%
Multi-Core
2440
42.119799758329016%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |