Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £58.88 vs £259.98
- Up to 76% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-13600K - £0.22 vs £0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - 289 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
272
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.9/FPS
24%
Price, £
£259.98
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for £259.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |