Buy on Amazon
£58.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 471 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - £3.85 vs £58.88
- Up to 95% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - £0.01 vs £0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core I3-7100 3.90 GHz CPU - Black
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
272
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£3.85
100%
Value Winner
Sweeaau 4-pin Floppy Male Power Connector To 15-pin Female Power Cable Adapter Converter Ryzen 7 2700x
Buy for £3.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.