Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 310 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 3200G - 172 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
