Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1812 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4160T - 117 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
