Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 201 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
